I'm thinking of purchasing this book and seeing what it's all about. I was at least impressed with the interview. I'm also thinking of seeing John Cusack's movie based on the book, War Inc.

~ steph

answers to a few questions

Considering the fact that I will begin classes on Wednesday, I suppose I have some answers to the questions previously set forth:

(01) When can I move into my new apartment?
I moved in on August 7th, which was MUCH sooner that anticipated! All parties involved were quite elated with the news. Many cheeks and pants were wetted in celebration!

(02) How am I going to fit all of my shit into my car & trailer?
Well, I didn't fit it all, but enough to get me by until I return for another load in December, though now I'm wishing I had placed a higher priority some objects than others... Hind sight is 20/20, right?

(03) Where can I store the trailer until I can unload it? And after that?
Well, considering I moved in the day I arrived, I didn't need to worry about the before, but the after was much better than I could have hoped. I was able to park it in a free "visitors" spot next to my building. I've gotten into the habit of checking on it every day. Must place lock on trailer...

(04) When will Jillian arrive if she can even come up now?
My beloved Jillian arrived July 31st! And there was much rejoicing!

(05) What should I leave behind?
See answer to Question #2.

(06) What do I need for orientation?
Nothing.

(07) How do I register for classes?
Michelle with help me with that on Monday, just like everyone else.

(08) Will a late registration fuck up my schedule?
N/A

(09) When will financial aid kick in?
They mail checks out on September 6th, so I shall look to the mail shortly after that.

(10) When can I cash out my financial aid?
Check previous answer.

(11) How much will all of this cost me!?!
TBA

~ steph

why must it be so complicated!?!

I had been patiently waiting for word from USM about class registration & orientation for the coming fall semester. I finally broke down a week ago and e-mailed my contact from the department. Apparently I was supposed to receive said information 3 weeks ago! I just got a postcard yesterday about orientation, but that is the least of my worries! Now Jillian can't fly out on the 25th as originally planned. So here is a new list of the things I'm freaking out about:

(01) When can I move into my new apartment?
(02) How am I going to fit all of my shit into my car & trailer?
(03) Where can I store the trailer until I can unload it? And after that?
(04) When will Jillian arrive if she can even come up now?
(05) What should I leave behind?
(06) What do I need for orientation?
(07) How do I register for classes?
(08) Will a late registration fuck up my schedule?
(09) When will financial aid kick in?
(10) When can I cash out my financial aid?
(11) How much will all of this cost me!?!

~ steph

huffing cocoa puffs

Had to grind cereal today, most like Cocoa Puffs, but it could have been an off-brand. Either way, I'm pretty sure my lungs are coated in chocolate powder. Makes me wonder if I'll be experiencing side effects from this later in life...

Part of a balanced breakfast!

~ steph

terror, terror! don't forget you're scared!

Drove past the airport on my way home from the MOA last night. I was all excited about the dress I bought for the wedding on Saturday until I saw a little electrical roadside sign indicating that we are currently under Orange Alert. Made me scared... What if something happens and I can't wear my dress!?! I don't really care for orange. In fact, it's one of my least favorite colors, unless the season is autumn--then I can dig it.

On a lighter note, check this out. Really gives me confidence in my government and their ability to keep me safe.

~steph

witness to an accident

Ok, so I wasn't exactly witness to the accident, but I was the first to stop and offer help. Which, by the way, upset me very much.



I was running late for work because I had to wait until 8:30 when the Post Office opened up. Traveling westbound on 394, I noticed that traffic was much too slow for 9:00am. When I came upon the scene, the first thing I noticed was the truck driving practically crawling away from the semi. Then next thing I noticed was that no one had stopped to offer help! I hadn't actually seen what had happened, but if traffic had been blocked to slow my path down, then there was ample space between the time of the accident and the time of my arrival. The was a very disturbing thought, and still is.



Though I could offer no formal aid, the fact that I had stopped, could lend a blanket to the victim and offer a hug to the woman who knew what to do made me feel less useless. I knew very well what needed to be done:



1) Call 911 (Check)

2) Check the scene for any endangering elements (gas leak from a quarter size hole in the tank)

3) Check the victim for consciousness & apparent injuries (someone else had pulled up and got to him first since I had to cross the road)

4) Keep the victim covered due to shock (BLANKET!)

5) Keep the victim talking until the professionals arrived (not my finest quality)



I was most disappointed in myself for the fact that I am not one to start up conversations when strangers, so I really didn't know what to say to him. Plus, there were 3 others that had stopped and seemed to know what to do. I think because of this incident, I will be looking into getting CPR & First Aid certified for next time. I was informally trained when I was an RA in college, but it has been almost 3 years since my last class on safety that I am quite rusty. If anyone has any suggestions as to where to look for such classes, please let me know. I've checked out the Red Cross website, but I'd like a few options.



~ steph

the moral equivalent of war

As I stated in my May 17th post titled "recipe for a president," I was only 96.3% sure of my support and convergence to the Libertarian party. Well, mark your calenders people because I have decided to take the plunge into the world of Libertarianism!

I had done quite a bit of research into the Libertarian party before hand, but what was keeping me from fully supporting this political party was my hangups regarding environmental issues. I hadn't been able to find a Libertarian argument dealing with the environment that I could agree with until today. Michael S. Rozeff sites this article in his argument that has proven to me that people have taken initiative to safeguard the environment without being told to do so by the government. Along with his breakdown of the article and Libertarian point of view, I now feel comfortable with calling myself a Libertarian!

On a side note, the biggest "environmental" push that I have a problem with is that of ethanol. I have previously stated that just to grow the corn to make the ethanol is environmentally inefficient. On top of this, it actually reduces gas mileage and creates more pollution! Let me explain (for clarity, the term gas will be in reference to the physical state):


Both traditional gasoline and ethanol burn cleanly. Many are made to think that the burning of gasoline is what releases the CO2 pollutant. It is not the burned gas but the unburned fuel that raises your emissions! Cars run on gas vapors.

What causes fuel inefficiency and ALL emissions coming from your car is the liquid fuel that gets pushed through your engine. This liquid cannot be burned, ruins your engine and exits your car through the tailpipe (i.e. lowering MPG & raising CO2 levels coming from your car).

The surface tension of the fuel is one of the main contributors of why some fuel is pushed through as gas and some as liquid. By lowering the surface tension, you increase your MPG and lower your CO2 emissions. Here's a little physical chemistry lesson for you: Have you ever seen a droplet of water on a nonporous surface? If you have, you must have noticed how it bulges up and 'sticks' to itself. Water is a polar molecule, so is alcohol, whether it be methanol, ethanol or any other -ol out there. The stronger the polarity of a substance, the higher the surface tension the substance will possess! And since I've just covered how surface tension effects fuel's ability to vaporize into a gas, you should be able to deduct that alcohol (i.e ethanol) is NOT as efficient a fuel as they have been trying to convince you!

Not only does this polarity increase surface tension, but in the chemistry world, like attracts like, therefore alcohol attracts water. Water aids in the breakdown of your engine further worsening your fuel efficiency. And since alcohol attracts water, this increases the percentage of water that gets pumped through your engine in comparison to traditional gasoline.

Earlier I mentioned that surface tension was one of the main contributors of why some fuel is pushed through as gas and some as liquid. Temperature is another. Higher temps aid in vapor production while lower temps hinder it. There really isn't much we can do about how temperature affects fuel efficiency, but there are other concerns when dealing with temperature. Water is a special molecule in that its volume increases when in a solid state rather than decreases like almost all other molecules. Place water in a closed bottle in the freezer and the bottle will wither expand or break. The same happens to your engine when too much water is present. And because a good portion of the US finds itself dealing with below freezing temps for at least part of the year, anything that attracts water is your car's enemy!


Ethanol, once the end-all-be-all of fuel sources, is no longer looking so environmentally friendly, now is it? I would also like to make it clear that I do not fully support this "rising CO2 levels is causing global warming" phenomenon.--not enough evidence has proven this to be true, there have only been mere correlations--I have only allowed emissions to be mentioned in this post so that those who believe it can use this information when they make their choice at the pump or car dealership.

On another side note, you might want to check this out if you're interested in increasing your MPG. I have yet to try it myself, but chemically, it sounds pretty believable. I'm just not a fan of his suggestions to push government requirements.

~ steph

why

About a week after the attacks on September 11, 2001, I began to ask myself and those around me why all this had happened. Back then, I wasn't all that into politics, and I am still in my infancy on the subject, but my gut reaction was, "What has our government done for these people to react in such a violent manner?" I knew it had nothing to do with our freedom of speech, freedom of religion, separation of church and state or any other freedom for that matter. I knew it had nothing to do with the American people but had everything to do with the American government. And if I were one to keep a diary, that is exactly what my entries during that time would have said.

So why are so many Americans upset with what Ron Paul had said in the debates on Tuesday night? Does the true really hurt that much, or were they interpreting him incorrectly? Rudy Giuliani's reaction alone:

"That's really an extraordinary statement, as someone who lived through the attack of 9/11, that we invited the attack because we were attacking Iraq. I don't think I have ever heard that before, and I have heard some pretty absurd explanations for Sept. 11. I would ask the congressman to withdraw that comment and tell us that he didn't really mean that."

makes me wonder if he's even competent enough to make decisions in his own home!

Are Americans really that self absorbed that we can only see what is being done to us and not what we do to others? I guess so! If that is what you think, then consider the following list of U.S. foreign policy toward Iraq:



1. The U.S. support of Saddam Hussein.

2. The U.S. furnishing of weapons of mass destruction to Saddam Hussein and the correlative assistance provided by the U.S. in the use of such weaponry.

3. The Persian Gulf intervention.

4. The intentional destruction of Iraq’s water and sewage facilities, with full knowledge as to what effect such action would have on the long-term health of the Iraqi people.

5. The more than 10 years of brutal sanctions, which contributed to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children from sickness and disease.

6. The deadly no-fly zones, which had not been authorized by either the UN or the U.S. Congress, and whose enforcement entailed the firing of missiles and the dropping of bombs that killed even more Iraqis.

7. U.S. Ambassador to the UN Madeleine Albright’s infamous statement to “Sixty Minutes” that reverberated throughout the Middle East that the deaths of half-a-million Iraqi children had been “worth it.”

8. The invasion and occupation of Iraq, which has killed and maimed hundreds of thousands of more Iraqis.

9. The torture and sex abuse of Iraqi men at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere in Iraq, photographs and videos of which are still being kept hidden by U.S. officials because of their potential blowback.

10. The periodic rapes and murders that some U.S. troops have committed against the Iraqi people during the occupation.

11. The arbitrary and indiscriminate searches and seizures without warrants being conducted by U.S. troops.

12. The indefinite detentions without trial of some 20,000 Iraqi men and women in overcrowded prisons.

~ steph

the other side of the war

I stumbled across this article and was moved by a comment that was left:

"Such butchery as we saw in WW2 (and WW1, and since) was NOT common place in previous centuries. The scale of slaughter in the 20th century dwarfed ALL conflicts of ALL previous ages in recorded history. It is only the massive growth of central government, debt financing, fiat currency, and obscene taxation that allows governments to amass the resources and mobilize the manpower to wage such wars of slaughter. There is no historical precedent, and even the bloodiest wars of prior ages paled in comparison because no governments could reorganize society and had the technological and financial reach and organization to organize slaughter on such a scale, especially the slaughter of civilians, who were the main targets of military activity judging casualty rolls. Historically wars were between governments, and often common people had nothing against each other and could travel freely. Prior to WW1, average tax rates were under 5% despite large militaries and works."

It's just another confirmation that we must downsize our current government. If we fail to uphold our checks and balances, Bush will become the next Hitler, as he is so close to it already!

~ steph

on money and other such things

Here is another good article I couldn't resist posting!

~ steph